Carnio, Henrique Garbellini2024-11-122024-11-122023BRUNETTA, Cíntia Menezes. Governança corporativa no poder judiciário: a busca de integridade sistêmica na administração da justiça. 2023. 188 f. Tese (Doutorado em Função Social do Direito) – Faculdade Autônoma de Direito, São Paulo, 2023.http://repositorio.unialfa.com.br/handle/123456789/457To what extent is there a corporate governance program within the Judiciary? What does adequate governance mean in the context of judicial administration and how does it help to achieve its purpose and systemic integrity? These are the questions that will be attempted to be answered throughout the work. In the first chapter, we will start from the perception that understanding the state of the art of governance studies – and the historical, cultural, economic, and practical factors that defined it – is to understand how institutions position themselves in the world and society, how they relate, communicate, and plan. It is to understand what the correct questions and strategies are within the desired organizational culture. Thus, at this point in the research, the pillars, principles, and characteristics of what became known as corporate governance in the world will be investigated, as structured from the second half of the 20th century, addressing the origin of the concepts, as well as their maturation and remodeling processes, based on market and societal transformations. In Chapter 2, the state of the art of governance policies in Brazil and their transposition to public administration will be discussed. At this point in the thesis, legal diplomas governing the subject, good practices, and various documentary references, both national and foreign, will be analyzed. The goal is to answer even more questions, indispensable for the continuation of the research: is it possible to efficiently transpose the concepts, principles, pillars, and mechanisms involved in a good corporate governance policy to Brazilian public administration? The chapter will be permeated by terms such as principles, purposes, values, systems, and dilemmas. We will talk about vision, choices, coherence, and sustainability. Based on these reflections, we will attempt to answer a key research question: is the governance checklist often found in public administration truly governance? The third chapter will enter the Judiciary and bring discussions related to the hypothesis, trying to answer the question “to what extent do we actually have governance in the Judiciary?”. The intention is not only to test the conformity of governance policies with the strategy defined by the Judiciary to achieve its purpose, but also to look back at the consequences of choosing a management model without commitment to the integrity of the system. For this part of the work, although we are aware that various courts have their own corporate governance policies, the focus is on the National Council of Justice (CNJ), both for its assigned role and the role it has assumed within the system. Thus, the CNJ Plenary will be considered the highest governing body of the institution, and its Councilors, President, and National Inspector will be considered its top authorities (or top executives). Finally, the last chapter aims to develop a tentative proposal for addressing governance in the Brazilian Judiciary with a focus on corporate responsibility as an indispensable tool for the achievement of systemic integrity in the administration of Justice. The present research, of qualitative bias and of an exploratory, deductive and descriptive nature, was supported by a documentary and bibliographical survey.ptGovernança corporativaPensamento sistêmicoAdministração públicaPoder judiciário