Sousa, Pedro Henrique Rodrigues de2026-01-162026-01-162025CAMILO, José Carlos Ferreira dos Santos. Integração da agenda 2030 no judiciário: estratégias de gestão administrativa para o alcance dos objetivos de desenvolvimento sustentável no poder judiciário. Goiânia (GO), 2025. 100 f. Dissertação (Mestrado Profissional em Administração) - Centro Universitário Alves Faria, 2025.http://repositorio.unialfa.com.br/handle/123456789/726This dissertation analyzes the integration of the 2030 Agenda into the Brazilian Judiciary, with emphasis on Sustainable Development Goal 16 (SDG 16), which focuses on promoting access to justice, consolidating effective institutions, and ensuring transparency in public administration. Structured in three articles, the research adopts different methodological approaches to examine trends, theoretical foundations, and empirical evidence on sustainable judicial governance. The first article presents a bibliometric study (2017–2024) based on international and national databases, identifying methodological gaps and a predominance of normative approaches in the literature on SDGs and the judiciary. The second article is a theoretical essay that reviews models of public and judicial governance in the context of sustainability, discusses classical and contemporary foundations, and proposes evaluation instruments aligned with SDG 16. The third article applies document and indicator analysis to the Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Goiás, examining initiatives in digital transformation, sustainable procurement, and the implementation of virtual platforms. This research is guided by the following central question: How has the integration of the 2030 Agenda, particularly SDG 16, been materialized in the administrative management of the Brazilian Judiciary, and what impacts has this integration produced in terms of efficiency, transparency, and institutional sustainability, with emphasis on the Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Goiás? The results show advances in productivity, digitalization, and institutional transparency, with a reduction in the congestion rate and improvement in average processing time, although critical issues remain in tax enforcement cases, which account for a large share of low-resolutivity processes. This study contributes to academic and practical debates on the administrative modernization of the Judiciary by proposing comparable indicators and strategies for aligning technological innovation, institutional sustainability, and the multilateral commitments of the 2030 Agenda.ptAgenda 2030Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável nº 16 (ODS 16)Governança judicial